Skip Navigation

New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance

  1. Patrick Dunleavy
  1. London School of Economics and Political Science
  1. Helen Margetts
  1. Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University
  1. Jane Tinkler
  1. London School of Economics and Political Science
  1. Address correspondence to Patrick Dunleavy at p.dunleavy{at}lse.ac.uk.

    Abstract

    The “new public management” (NPM) wave in public sector organizational change was founded on themes of disaggregation, competition, and incentivization. Although its effects are still working through in countries new to NPM, this wave has now largely stalled or been reversed in some key “leading-edge” countries. This ebbing chiefly reflects the cumulation of adverse indirect effects on citizens' capacities for solving social problems because NPM has radically increased institutional and policy complexity. The character of the post-NPM regime is currently being formed. We set out the case that a range of connected and information technology–centered changes will be critical for the current and next wave of change, and we focus on themes of reintegration, needs-based holism, and digitization changes. The overall movement incorporating these new shifts is toward “digital-era governance” (DEG), which involves reintegrating functions into the governmental sphere, adopting holistic and needs-oriented structures, and progressing digitalization of administrative processes. DEG offers a perhaps unique opportunity to create self-sustaining change, in a broad range of closely connected technological, organizational, cultural, and social effects. But there are alternative scenarios as to how far DEG will be recognized as a coherent phenomenon and implemented successfully.

      | Table of Contents

      This Article

      1. J Public Adm Res Theory 16 (3): 467-494. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui057
      1. All Versions of this Article:
        1. mui057v1
        2. 16/3/467 most recent

      Classifications

      Share

      1. Email this article

      Impact Factor: 3.893

      5-Yr impact factor: 4.545

      Editor

      Bradley E. Wright

      Director, PMRA Journals

      Kenneth J. Meier



      For Authors

      Oxford Open RCUK

      Looking for your next opportunity?

      Looking for jobs...

      Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.