Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access published online on November 20, 2006
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, doi:10.1093/jopart/mul017
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/357    most recent
mul017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meier, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Strategic Management and the Performance of Public Organizations: Testing Venerable Ideas against Recent Theories

Kenneth J. Meier 1 *, Laurence J. O'Toole Jr 2, George A. Boyne 3, and Richard M. Walker 4

1 Texas A&M University and Cardiff University
2 University of Georgia
3 Cardiff University
4 University of Hong Kong and Cardiff University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Kenneth J. Meier, E-mail: kmeier{at}polisci.tamu.edu


  Abstract

Miles and Snow, among others, argue that strategy content is an important influence on organizational performance. Their typology, applied recently to public organizations in the United Kingdom, divides strategic actors into four general types: prospectors, defenders, analyzers, and reactors. This article begins by integrating work on strategy content or strategic management into the O'Toole-Meier formal theory of public management. This study shows that strategy content is a subset of generally accepted management functions in public organizations. The article then proceeds to test the strategic management concepts in a large, multiyear sample of public organizations. The results show that strategy can be separated out from other elements of management for a distinguishable assessment of its impact on organizational performance. Unlike the predictions of Miles and Snow and the empirical findings of Boyne and Walker, however, we find that the defender strategy is the most effective for the primary mission of the organization and that the prospector and reactor strategies work best in regard to the goals of the more politically powerful elements of the organization's environment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
L. J. O'Toole jr and K. J. Meier
The Human Side of Public Organizations: Contributions to Organizational Performance
The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2009; 39(5): 499 - 518.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
W. S. Jacobson, C. K. Palus, and C. J. Bowling
A Woman's Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 24, 2009; (2009) mup017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
G. A. Brewer and R. M. Walker
The Impact of Red Tape on Governmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., February 18, 2009; (2009) mun040v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
K. J. Meier and L. J. O'Toole Jr
Management Theory and Occam's Razor: How Public Organizations Buffer the Environment
Administration Society, January 1, 2008; 39(8): 931 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.