Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access published online on February 1, 2006
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, doi:10.1093/jopart/muj006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/511    most recent
muj006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandey, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Article

Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager's Role Ambiguity

Sanjay K. Pandey 1 * and Bradley E. Wright 2

1 Rutgers University, Campus at Camden
2 University of North Carolina at Charlotte

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sanjay K. Pandey, E-mail: skpandey{at}camden.rutgers.edu


  Abstract

This article is a systematic effort to study a key theoretical question from the vantage point of public sector organizational behavior. Most political science models, with a primary interest in democratic control of bureaucracy, study the political influence on the bureaucracy from an agency theory perspective. Organization behavior literature, on the other hand, is focused largely on the study of individual-level phenomena in private organizations and does not incorporate political context as part of explanatory models. This article proposes a middle-range theory to "connect the dots," beginning with disparate sources in the polity influencing organizational goal ambiguity, which in turn is expected to increase managerial role ambiguity. An empirical test, using data collected from a national survey of managers working in state human service agencies, supports this theoretical model. We find that certain types of political influence have an impact on organizational goal ambiguity, which in turn has a direct effect in increasing role ambiguity and also an indirect effect in increasing role ambiguity through organizational structure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
B. E. Wright and S. K. Pandey
Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person--Organization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence
Administration Society, September 1, 2008; 40(5): 502 - 521.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
R. Andrews, G. A. Boyne, J. Law, and R. M. Walker
Centralization, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., February 29, 2008; (2008) mum039v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. Yang and S. K. Pandey
How Do Perceived Political Environment and Administrative Reform Affect Employee Commitment?
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., February 28, 2008; (2008) mun002v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. Yang
Examining Perceived Honest Performance Reporting by Public Organizations: Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Practice
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 22, 2008; (2008) mum042v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.