Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access published online on February 18, 2005
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, doi:10.1093/jopart/mui034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/4/585    most recent
mui034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Article

The Effects of Managerial Succession on Organizational Performance

Gregory C. Hill 1*

1 Texas A&M University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gregory C. Hill, E-mail: ghill{at}politics.tamu.edu


  Abstract

Boyne and Dahya (2002) posit that the means, motives, and opportunities available to top managers will affect their ability to impact organizational performance. In this analysis, I test the theory posited by Boyne and Dahya and expand the model by exploring whether the performance effects of executive succession differ between an internal promotion and an external hire. Using Texas school superintendents as the managers in question, I use pooled, time-series data to test both the immediate and the long-term effects of managerial succession on performance. The findings reveal that an immediate, negative effect of executive succession is present only in the case of an externally hired replacement and that the long-term effect of managerial change on organizational performance is positive. These findings suggest that public managerial succession does influence organizational performance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
L. J. O'Toole jr and K. J. Meier
The Human Side of Public Organizations: Contributions to Organizational Performance
The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2009; 39(5): 499 - 518.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
W. S. Jacobson, C. K. Palus, and C. J. Bowling
A Woman's Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 24, 2009; (2009) mup017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. J. Meier and A. Hicklin
Employee Turnover and Organizational Performance: Testing a Hypothesis from Classical Public Administration
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2008; 18(4): 573 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
A. Hicklin, L. J. O'Toole Jr., and K. J. Meier
Serpents in the Sand: Managerial Networking and Nonlinear Influences on Organizational Performance
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2008; 18(2): 253 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
K. J. Meier and L. J. O'Toole Jr
Management Theory and Occam's Razor: How Public Organizations Buffer the Environment
Administration Society, January 1, 2008; 39(8): 931 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr, G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker
Strategic Management and the Performance of Public Organizations: Testing Venerable Ideas against Recent Theories
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2007; 17(3): 357 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.