Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access published online on February 18, 2005

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, doi:10.1093/jopart/mui032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/4/489    most recent
mui032v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, R.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Article

Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Government

Rhys Andrews 1*, George A. Boyne 1, Kenneth J. Meier 2, Laurence J. O'Toole Jr.3, and Richard M. Walker 4

1 Cardiff University
2 Texas A&M University and Cardiff University
3 University of Georgia
4 University of Hong Kong and Cardiff University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Rhys Andrews, E-mail: andrewsr{at}cardiff.ac.uk


   Abstract

The theory of representative bureaucracy suggests that organizations perform better if their workforces reflect the characteristics of their constituent populations. The management literature implies that the impact of representative bureaucracy is contingent on organizational strategy. Our empirical evidence on English local government is inconsistent with the basic theory of representative bureaucracy but supports a moderating effect of organizational strategy. Representative bureaucracy is negatively associated with citizens' perceptions of local authority performance. However, organizations pursuing a prospector strategy are able to mitigate this negative relationship.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OXF ECON PAPHome page
F. Revelli
Spend more, get more? An inquiry into English local government performance
Oxf. Econ. Pap., October 27, 2009; (2009) gpp037v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
J. Schalk, R. Torenvlied, and J. Allen
Network Embeddedness and Public Agency Performance: The Strength of Strong Ties in Dutch Higher Education
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 31, 2009; (2009) mup018v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
W. S. Jacobson, C. K. Palus, and C. J. Bowling
A Woman's Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 24, 2009; (2009) mup017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
A. Ritz
Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government
International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2009; 75(1): 53 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. S. Vaughn and J. D. Villalobos
The Managing of the Presidency: Applying Theory-Driven Empirical Models to the Study of White House Bureaucratic Performance
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2009; 62(1): 158 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
M. D. Bradbury and J. E. Kellough
Representative Bureaucracy: Exploring the Potential for Active Representation in Local Government
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2008; 18(4): 697 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
R. Andrews, G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker
Reconstructing Empirical Public Administration: Lutonism or Scientific Realism?
Administration Society, May 1, 2008; 40(3): 324 - 330.
[PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
L. S. Luton
Beyond Empiricists Versus Postmodernists
Administration Society, April 1, 2008; 40(2): 211 - 219.
[PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
A. Hicklin, L. J. O'Toole Jr., and K. J. Meier
Serpents in the Sand: Managerial Networking and Nonlinear Influences on Organizational Performance
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2008; 18(2): 253 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
K. J. Meier and L. J. O'Toole Jr.
Deconstructing Larry Luton: Or What Time Is the Next Train to Reality Junction?
Administration Society, October 1, 2007; 39(6): 786 - 796.
[PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
D. W. Pitts
Representative Bureaucracy, Ethnicity, and Public Schools: Examining the Link Between Representation and Performance
Administration Society, July 1, 2007; 39(4): 497 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
L. S. Luton
Deconstructing Public Administration Empiricism
Administration Society, July 1, 2007; 39(4): 527 - 544.
[PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr, G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker
Strategic Management and the Performance of Public Organizations: Testing Venerable Ideas against Recent Theories
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2007; 17(3): 357 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human Resource Development ReviewHome page
S. M. Awbrey
The Dynamics of Vertical and Horizontal Diversity in Organization and Society
Human Resource Development Review, March 1, 2007; 6(1): 7 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
G. Bouckaert
Modernising Government: The Way Forward--a comment
International Review of Administrative Sciences, September 1, 2006; 72(3): 327 - 332.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.