Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access originally published online on November 13, 2007
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2009 19(1):125-143; doi:10.1093/jopart/mum035
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Role of Procedural Justice in Public Personnel Management: Empirical Results from the Department of Defense
University of Georgia
Address correspondence to the author at evrubin{at}uga.edu.
This article examines the relationship between federal employee perceptions of procedural justice and work satisfaction rates, turnover intentions, and the degree to which employees trust their managers. As the federal government considers reforming the civil service system, including changes to the procedures used to discipline employees and resolve grievances, understanding these relationships becomes particularly important. Analysis of Department of Defense data from the 2002 Federal Human Capital Survey indicates a significant, positive relationship between procedural justice perceptions, satisfaction rates, and trust in management. Likewise, a significant and negative relationship exists between procedural justice perceptions and turnover intentions. Interestingly, given similar levels of procedural justice perceptions, managers exhibit lower levels of satisfaction and trust and higher turnover intentions. This study provides an important benchmark for Defense and other agencies that are redesigning personnel systems and serves as a caution against implementing systems that employees may not view as either legitimate or just.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Yang and A. Kassekert Linking Management Reform with Employee Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Federal Agencies J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., June 18, 2009; (2009) mup010v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
