Skip Navigation


Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access originally published online on January 5, 2006
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2006 16(4):533-552; doi:10.1093/jopart/muj005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/533    most recent
muj005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graddy, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Influences on the Size and Scope of Networks for Social Service Delivery

Elizabeth A. Graddy and Bin Chen

University of Southern California

Address correspondence to Elizabeth A. Graddy at graddy{at}usc.edu.

Local social service agencies throughout the world have begun encouraging or requiring social service providers to form community-based networks for the delivery of publicly funded social services. Little is known, however, about the nature of the resulting networks. In this article we develop a model of organizational, programmatic, and community influences on the size and scope of interorganizational networks for social service delivery. We then apply this theoretical framework to an empirical study of service delivery networks in the Family Preservation Program in Los Angeles County. Our findings suggest that the availability of potential partners in the community, the scope of required services, and the ethnic homogeneity of the client population are key determinants of network size. We develop the implications of the results for theories of partnership formation and for more effective management of network formation processes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
K. T. Lambright
Getting What You Ask For: Barriers to Proper Use of Service Monitoring Tools
The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2008; 38(3): 362 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
W. Krueathep, N. M. Riccucci, and C. Suwanmala
Why Do Agencies Work Together? The Determinants of Network Formation at the Subnational Level of Government in Thailand
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 12, 2008; (2008) mun013v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
K. G. Provan and P. Kenis
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2008; 18(2): 229 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.