Skip Navigation


Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access originally published online on December 16, 2004
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005 15(3):441-462; doi:10.1093/jopart/mui020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/3/441    most recent
mui020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourdeaux, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 15, no. 3 © 2005 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.; all rights reserved.

A Question of Genesis: An Analysis of the Determinants of Public Authorities

Carolyn Bourdeaux

Georgia State University

Address correspondence to the author at cbourdeaux{at}gsu.edu.

One of the central questions in the study of special purpose governments is how to explain their proliferation over the past fifty years. Of particular concern to scholars has been the rise of a hidden government that is not highly accountable through regular democratic processes. This article looks specifically at one form of special purpose government, known as a "public authority," and amends the conventional explanation that local governments principally create public authorities to address public finance concerns. First, I argue that full "service public authorities," which administer and make policy about a particular service arena, raise different concerns about democratic accountability from a "conduit authority" and are a nonparsimonious solution to a public finance problem. Second, drawing on an archival survey of the institutional choices of county governments in dealing with solid waste policymaking in New York State, I find that while public finance is a driver in the choice to create a service public authority, equally, if not more important, are the needs of local government to resolve a policy problem in a politically competitive environment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
C. Bourdeaux
Politics versus Professionalism: The Effect of Institutional Structure on Democratic Decision Making in a Contested Policy Arena
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2008; 18(3): 349 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
C. Bourdeaux
Reexamining the Claim of Public Authority Efficacy
Administration Society, March 1, 2007; 39(1): 77 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.