| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 14, No. 3: 267-282 (2004)
© 2004 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.; all rights reserved
The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?
Oxford University
University of Pittsburgh
As "New Public Management" enters middle age, scholarly attention has moved to some degree from descriptive mapping and a priori critiques to the analysis of surprises and paradoxes associated with recent and contemporary public service reforms. Some standard analytic lenses for examining such paradoxes, explored here, are the Mertonian tradition of analyzing unintended effects of social interventions, cultural theories of surprise, and the analysis of discontinuities and unexpected couplings in the operation of complex systems, though the New Public Management literature to date has employed the first lens more intensively than the other two. We conclude by exploring features of New Public Management reforms that may have contributed to paradoxical effects and argue that the analysis of such paradoxes can help advance administrative science and the understanding of public sector reform.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. B. Salter Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security Security Dialogue, April 1, 2008; 39(2-3): 243 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gleeson and D. Knights Reluctant Leaders: An Analysis of Middle Managers' Perceptions of Leadership in Further Education in England Leadership, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 49 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Willem and M. Buelens Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2007; 17(4): 581 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Halligan Reintegrating Government in Third Generation Reforms of Australia and New Zealand Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2007; 22(2): 217 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Mehde Governance, Administrative Science, and the Paradoxes of New Public Management Public Policy and Administration, December 1, 2006; 21(4): 60 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Johns and B. Jordan Social Work, Merit and Ethnic Diversity Br. J. Soc. Work, December 1, 2006; 36(8): 1271 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Catlaw Authority, Representation, and the Contradictions of Posttraditional Governing The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2006; 36(3): 261 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dunleavy, H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2006; 16(3): 467 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Maxcy Leaving Children Behind: How "Texas-Style" Accountability Fails Latino Youth Educational Administration Quarterly, April 1, 2006; 42(2): 256 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Callahan and G. R. Gilbert End-User Satisfaction and Design Features of Public Agencies The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2005; 35(1): 57 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






