Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access originally published online on February 18, 2005
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005 15(4):633-639; doi:10.1093/jopart/mui037
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.
Conclusion |
Where Next? Research Directions on Performance in Public Organizations
Cardiff University
Texas A&M University and Cardiff University
University of Georgia
University of Hong Kong and Cardiff University
Address correspondence to George A. Boyne at boyne@cardiff.ac.uk.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The dependent variable in all the articles presented in this symposium issue of JPART was organizational performance in public agencies. Management variables included organizational strategy, resources, leadership, goals, workforce diversity, and representation. The empirical articles also controlled for external effects on performance. Although the collection of articles presented here is a major step forward for research on public organizations, the evidence that management matters needs additional exploration, and the methods used by scholars need to be improved.
Public organizations are required to address a range of goals, some of which may be in conflict. This obligation in turn requires organizations that deliver public services to focus their attention on multiple dimensions of performance. Boyne (2002) has identified sixteen dimensions of performance in public organizations grouped into five themesoutputs, efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness, and democratic outcomes. Four of these themes are captured in the empirical articles presented here. Output quality is considered
| PUBLIC MANAGEMENT MATTERS FOR PERFORMANCE, BUT WHEN, WHERE, AND HOW? |
|---|
| PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. S. Jacobson, C. K. Palus, and C. J. Bowling A Woman's Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 24, 2009; (2009) mup017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Amirkhanyan Collaborative Performance Measurement: Examining and Explaining the Prevalence of Collaboration in State and Local Government Contracts J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2009; 19(3): 523 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Amirkhanyan, Hyun Joon Kim, and K. T. Lambright Faith-Based Assumptions About Performance: Does Church Affiliation Matter for Service Quality and Access? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 38(3): 490 - 521. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Avellaneda Municipal Performance: Does Mayoral Quality Matter? J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2009; 19(2): 285 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Brewer and R. M. Walker The Impact of Red Tape on Governmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., February 18, 2009; (2009) mun040v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hou and D. P. Moynihan The Case for Countercyclical Fiscal Capacity J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 139 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bouckaert Modernising Government: The Way Forward--a comment International Review of Administrative Sciences, September 1, 2006; 72(3): 327 - 332. [PDF] |
||||


