Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2: 173-202 (1998)
© 1998 Public Management Research Association
research-article |
Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?
1University of New Mexico
2Texas A&M University
Principal-agent models have been the basis for an extensive set of studies relating bureaucracy to elected officials. Yet despite the outpouring of research, there has been little attempt to test the basic assumptions of the principal-agent model. The model makes two assumptions: that goal conflict exists between principals and agents and that agents have more information than their principals, which results in an information asymmetry between them. But how valid are these assumptions? Can instances be found in which these assumptions do not hold? What happens when we vary these assumptions? In this article, we present both a critique of the traditional principal-agent model and a presentation of a broader theoretical framework for conceptualizing bureaucratic politics.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Kelleher and S. W. Yackee A Political Consequence of Contracting: Organized Interests and State Agency Decision Making J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2009; 19(3): 579 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yang Examining Perceived Honest Performance Reporting by Public Organizations: Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Practice J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2009; 19(1): 81 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Benjamin Evaluator's Role in Accountability Relationships: Measurement Technician, Capacity Builder or Risk Manager? Evaluation, July 1, 2008; 14(3): 323 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Benjamin Bearing More Risk for Results: Performance Accountability and Nonprofit Relational Work Administration Society, January 1, 2008; 39(8): 959 - 983. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Dunlop and O. James Principal-Agent Modelling and Learning: The European Commission, Experts and Agricultural Hormone Growth Promoters Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 2007; 22(4): 403 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Lindquist, S. B. Haire, and D. R. Songer Supreme Court Auditing of the US Courts of Appeals: An Organizational Perspective J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2007; 17(4): 607 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Lewis and S. K. Ramakrishnan Police Practices in Immigrant-Destination Cities: Political Control or Bureaucratic Professionalism? Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2007; 42(6): 874 - 900. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Van Slyke Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2007; 17(2): 157 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Kelleher and S. W. Yackee Who's Whispering in Your Ear? The Influence of Third Parties Over State Agency Decisions Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2006; 59(4): 629 - 643. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Whitaker, L. Altman-Sauer, and M. Henderson Mutual Accountability between Governments and Nonprofits: Moving Beyond "Surveillance" to "Service" The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2004; 34(2): 115 - 133. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Maranto and K. M. Hult Right Turn?: Political Ideology in the Higher Civil Service, 1987-1994 The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2004; 34(2): 199 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. van Slyke and C. A. Hammonds The Privatization Decision: Do Public Managers Make a Difference? The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2003; 33(2): 146 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Schmidt Politicization and Responsiveness in the Regional Offices of the NLRB The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2002; 32(2): 188 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Durant and W. F. West Merit Protection, Federal Agencies, and the New Personnel Management: Explaining Cross-Agency Variation in MSPB Appeals Decisions, FY 1988 to FY 1997 Administration Society, January 1, 2001; 32(6): 627 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Box Running Government Like a Business: Implications for Public Administration Theory and Practice The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 1999; 29(1): 19 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






