Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2008
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2009 19(1):81-105; doi:10.1093/jopart/mum042
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examining Perceived Honest Performance Reporting by Public Organizations: Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Practice
Florida State University
Address correspondence to the author at kyang{at}fsu.edu.
The credibility of performance information provided by government agencies to their stakeholders is critical to performance-based accountability and policy learning. However, the public administration literature has rarely paid attention to the determinants of honest performance reporting. This study draws on the multi-actor principal-agent model and examines how bureaucratic politics (external and internal) and organizational practice (participation and culture) affect an organization's performance reporting. Based on survey data from Taiwan, the results show that supportive external environments and harmonious internal environments are likely to enhance stakeholder participation and innovation culture, which, in turn, encourage honest performance reporting.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Yang and A. Kassekert Linking Management Reform with Employee Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Federal Agencies J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., June 18, 2009; (2009) mup010v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
