Skip Navigation


Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access originally published online on January 26, 2005
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2006 16(1):67-86; doi:10.1093/jopart/mui028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/67    most recent
mui028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houston, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

"Walking the Walk" of Public Service Motivation: Public Employees and Charitable Gifts of Time, Blood, and Money

David J. Houston

University of Tennessee

Address correspondence to the author at dhouston{at}utk.edu.

Research generally indicates that public employees "talk the talk," but do they also "walk the walk" of the public service motive (PSM)? Are public service employees more likely than others to engage in public service activities? The behavioral implications of PSM are addressed by studying the involvement in charitable activities of public, nonprofit, and private workers. Using data from the 2002 General Social Survey, multivariate logistic regression models are estimated to examine self-reported gifts of time, blood, and money to charitable organizations. It is found that government employees are more likely to volunteer for charity and to donate blood than for-profit employees are. Additionally, nonprofit workers are also more likely than their for-profit counterparts to volunteer. However, no difference is found among public service and private employees in terms of individual philanthropy. These findings generally lend support for the hypothesis that PSM is more prominent in public service than in private organizations, especially as it pertains to government personnel.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
Liu Bangcheng
Evidence of public service motivation of social workers in China
International Review of Administrative Sciences, June 1, 2009; 75(2): 349 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
Seong Soo Oh and G. B. Lewis
Can Performance Appraisal Systems Inspire Intrinsically Motivated Employees?
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2009; 29(2): 158 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
J. Word and Sung Min Park
Working Across the Divide: Job Involvement in the Public and Nonprofit Sectors
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2009; 29(2): 103 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
W. Vandenabeele
The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: more robust evidence of the PSM--performance relationship
International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2009; 75(1): 11 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
S. Kim
Revising Perry's Measurement Scale of Public Service Motivation
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2009; 39(2): 149 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.