Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hefetz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14:171-190 (2004)
© 2004 Public Management Research Association

Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process

Amir Hefetz

Technion, Israel Institute of Technology

Mildred Warner

Cornell University

Empirical evidence shows local government contracting is a dynamic process that includes movements from public delivery to markets and from market contracts back to in-house delivery. This "reverse contracting" reflects the complexity of public service provision in a world where market alternatives are used along with public delivery. We develop a methodology to link responses to national surveys and create a longitudinal data set that captures the dynamics of the contracting process. We present a framework that incorporates principal agent problems, government management, monitoring and citizen concerns, and market structure. Our statistical analysis finds government management, monitoring, and principal agent problems to be most important in explaining both new contracting out and contracting back-in. Professional managers recognize the importance of monitoring and the need for public engagement in the service delivery process. The results support the new public service that argues public managers do more than steer a market process; they balance technical and political concerns to secure public value.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
C. J. Heinrich
Third-Party Governance under No Child Left Behind: Accountability and Performance Management Challenges
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2010; 20(suppl_1): i59 - i80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
M. D. Bradbury and G. D. Waechter
Extreme Outsourcing in Local Government: At the Top and All But the Top
Review of Public Personnel Administration, September 1, 2009; 29(3): 230 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
C.-A. Chen
Antecedents of Contracting-Back-In: A View Beyond the Economic Paradigm
Administration Society, March 1, 2009; 41(1): 101 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
J. Sandfort, S. C. Selden, and J. E. Sowa
Do Government Tools Influence Organizational Performance?: Examining Their Implementation in Early Childhood Education
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2008; 38(4): 412 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
S. Fernandez, J. E. Ryu, and J. L. Brudney
Exploring Variations in Contracting for Services Among American Local Governments: Do Politics Still Matter?
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2008; 38(4): 439 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
S. Lamothe, M. Lamothe, and R. C. Feiock
Examining Local Government Service Delivery Arrangements Over Time
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2008; 44(1): 27 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CESifo Economic StudiesHome page
P. Francois and M. Vlassopoulos
Pro-social Motivation and the Delivery of Social Services
CESifo Economic Studies, March 1, 2008; 54(1): 22 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
C. J. Heinrich and Y. Choi
Performance-Based Contracting in Social Welfare Programs
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2007; 37(4): 409 - 435.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
A. A. Amirkhanyan
The Smart-Seller Challenge: Exploring the Determinants of Privatizing Public Nursing Homes
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2007; 17(3): 501 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
J. Gerbasi and M. E. Warner
Privatization, Public Goods, and the Ironic Challenge of Free Trade Agreements
Administration Society, April 1, 2007; 39(2): 127 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
S. Fernandez and C. R. Smith
Looking for Evidence of Public Employee Opposition to Privatization: An Empirical Study With Implications for Practice
Review of Public Personnel Administration, December 1, 2006; 26(4): 356 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
J. Teicher, Q. Alam, and B. V. Gramberg
Managing trust and relationships in PPPs: some Australian experiences
International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2006; 72(1): 85 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.