| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13:83-102 (2003)
© 2003 Public Management Research Association
The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government
Georgia State University
Dramatic developments in information technology are transforming society, challenging our nation's many governments to keep pace. As e-governance grows in popularity, Web pages could well become the new face of government. But how are citizens responding? We suggest that government Web sites may provide a new vehicle for citizen-initiated contacts with government, and, drawing from the literature on those traditional contacts, we propose a number of hypotheses on citizen interaction with government via the Web. To test those hypotheses, we examine data from a survey concerning how Georgians are contacting government via the Web. We find that citizen visits to governmental Web sites are increasingly common, and as such appear to have become a major new form of the traditional citizen-initiated contact. To date, however, most of these Web contacts have been made only to obtain information, thus lacking the interactive quality crucial to other citizen-initiated contacts. As an encouraging finding for government, visitors to governmental Web sites appear to be mostly pleased with their experiences, rating those sites as at least comparable in quality to other Web sites. A discouraging finding, however, is that the demographics of these visitors suggest cause for concern, since the digital divide is even more pronounced among government Web site visitors than among Internet users in general. In the concluding section, we discuss the implications of the findings for government and for future research.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Pieterson and W. Ebbers The use of service channels by citizens in the Netherlands: implications for multi-channel management International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2008; 74(1): 95 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Rodriguez Bolivar, C. Caba Perez, and A. M. Lopez Hernandez E-Government and Public Financial Reporting: The Case of Spanish Regional Governments The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2007; 37(2): 142 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Streib and I. Navarro Citizen Demand for Interactive E-Government: The Case of Georgia Consumer Services The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2006; 36(3): 288 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Dimitrova and Y.-C. Chen Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services: The Influence of Psychological Characteristics, Civic Mindedness, and Information Channels Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2006; 24(2): 172 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mossberger, C. J. Tolbert, and M. Gilbert Race, Place, and Information Technology Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2006; 41(5): 583 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Moore, J. Nolan, and G. F. Segal Putting Out The Trash: Measuring Municipal Service Efficiency in U.S. Cities Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2005; 41(2): 237 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Moon and E. W. Welch Same Bed, Different Dreams? A Comparative Analysis of Citizen and Bureaucrat Perspectives on E-Government Review of Public Personnel Administration, September 1, 2005; 25(3): 243 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Thomas and G. Streib E-Democracy, E-Commerce, and E-Research: Examining the Electronic Ties Between Citizens and Governments Administration Society, July 1, 2005; 37(3): 259 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Callahan and G. R. Gilbert End-User Satisfaction and Design Features of Public Agencies The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2005; 35(1): 57 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T.-K. Ho and A. Y. Ni Explaining the Adoption of E-Government Features: A Case Study of Iowa County Treasurers' Offices The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2004; 34(2): 164 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||





