Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 12, No. 4: 467-492 (2002)
© 2002 Public Management Research Association
research-article |
What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach
University of Colorado Denver
One of the earliest topics addressed by policy analysts was public policy implementation. Starting with the seminal work of Jeffrey Pressman and Aaron Wildavsky, policy implementation has burgeoned from a largely overlooked interest to perhaps the policy analysis growth industry over the last thirty years. However, even though an enormous set of books and articles deals with implementation, it has been described by some as leading to an intellectual dead end because of its problematic relationship to a generalized theory of policy implementation. In this article we examine three generations of policy implementation theory research, emphasizing its basic reliance on a command (i.e., top-down) orientation, and we argue that an alternative framework, one stressing a more democratic (i.e., bottom-up) approach, would be a more fruitful line of inquiry
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Mischen and T. A. P. Sinclair Making Implementation More Democratic through Action Implementation Research J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2009; 19(1): 145 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Choudhury Trust in Administration: An Integrative Approach to Optimal Trust Administration Society, October 1, 2008; 40(6): 586 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. McDermott Incentives, Capacity, and Implementation: Evidence from Massachusetts Education Reform J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2006; 16(1): 45 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

