Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Selden, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 10, No. 4: 685-712 (2000)
© 2000 Public Management Research Association


research-article

Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies

Gene A. Brewer and Sally Coleman Selden

University of Georgia
Syracuse University

Hal G. Rainey and Paula Steinbauer (1999) recently proposed a theory of effective government organizations.1 Several other theories exist in whole or in part, but empirical testing is rare. In this article we cut to the chase and examine several key elements of these theories empirically. First, we explore the theoretical dimensions of organizational performance and derive a taxonomy to help measure the construct. Second, we draw from the literature and develop a model predicting organizational performance. Third, we operationalize and test the model with data from the 1996 Merit Principles Survey, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. In the end, this model explains 70 percent of the variation in employee perceptions of organizational performance across the twenty-three largest federal agencies. Most hypothesized relationships are confirmed. We conclude the article with a discussion of implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
G. L. Percival
Exploring the Influence of Local Policy Networks on the Implementation of Drug Policy Reform: The Case of California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2009; 19(4): 795 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
J. Schalk, R. Torenvlied, and J. Allen
Network Embeddedness and Public Agency Performance: The Strength of Strong Ties in Dutch Higher Education
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 31, 2009; (2009) mup018v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
R. M. Walker and G. A. Brewer
Can Management Strategy Minimize the Impact of Red Tape on Organizational Performance?
Administration Society, July 1, 2009; 41(4): 423 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
P. J. May and S. C. Winter
Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2009; 19(3): 453 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
Liu Bangcheng
Evidence of public service motivation of social workers in China
International Review of Administrative Sciences, June 1, 2009; 75(2): 349 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
A. A. Amirkhanyan, Hyun Joon Kim, and K. T. Lambright
Faith-Based Assumptions About Performance: Does Church Affiliation Matter for Service Quality and Access?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 38(3): 490 - 521.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
C. N. Avellaneda
Municipal Performance: Does Mayoral Quality Matter?
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2009; 19(2): 285 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
G. Enticott, G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker
The Use of Multiple Informants in Public Administration Research: Data Aggregation Using Organizational Echelons
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2009; 19(2): 229 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
A. Hondeghem and J. L. Perry
EGPA symposium on public service motivation and performance: Introduction
International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2009; 75(1): 5 - 9.
[PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
A. Ritz
Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government
International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2009; 75(1): 53 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
S. Kim
Revising Perry's Measurement Scale of Public Service Motivation
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2009; 39(2): 149 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
G. A. Brewer and R. M. Walker
The Impact of Red Tape on Governmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., February 18, 2009; (2009) mun040v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
R. Ashworth, G. Boyne, and R. Delbridge
Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2009; 19(1): 165 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
B. E. Wright and S. K. Pandey
Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person--Organization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence
Administration Society, September 1, 2008; 40(5): 502 - 521.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
E. Camilleri
Towards Developing an Organisational Commitment - Public Service Motivation Model for the Maltese Public Service Employees
Public Policy and Administration, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 63 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
G. A. Boyne
Explaining Public Service Performance: Does Management Matter?
Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 2004; 19(4): 100 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.